Tufts Review/Courses

Courses

EC 11: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

RMP review average1.5 / 52 sampled ratings2 external reviews0 community reviewsSelected reviews only, not the platform overall rating.

Examine consumer choices, production, prices, and market structure.

0 community reviews

Community Reviews

No community reviews yet.

RMP review average

Rate My Professors

RMP review average1.5 / 52 sampled ratings

Arithmetic mean of the 2 numeric source ratings included below. Selected reviews only, not the platform overall rating. Unrated discussions are excluded. This does not affect Tufts Review community ratings.

External review summaries

2

AI-assisted editorial summaries of public posts, not reviews submitted here. Authors and experiences are not independently verified. These selected opinions are not a representative sample. External scores belong to individual source reviews and do not affect Tufts Review ratings.

  1. Rate My Professors

    EC11 with Michael Quinn

    Rate My Professors individual rating1.0 / 5Original teaching rating · RMP

    A substantial independent-study load

    A reviewer found the pace fast and the slides hard to navigate. They described difficult problem sets and exams, and felt they needed substantial independent study.

    Source details

    EC11 review dated 2025-11-19 on Michael Quinn's Tufts University profile

    Source text checked Sep 17, 2026. The date above is the date displayed by the source, not a new submission.

    Read original
  2. Rate My Professors

    EC11 with Michael Quinn

    Rate My Professors individual rating2.0 / 5Original teaching rating · RMP

    Support structure was a concern

    A reviewer felt they had to teach themselves much of the material and wished the offering had a teaching assistant or recitation. They found the permitted exam notes helpful.

    Source details

    EC11 review dated 2025-05-31 on Michael Quinn's Tufts University profile

    Source text checked Sep 17, 2026. The date above is the date displayed by the source, not a new submission.

    Read original